Category Archives: Bechtel’s Blog

Jul. 15th, 2014

I will get back to “Love Song”.   Really.

But first, I need to finish the discussion of two person plays and honoring the playwright’s intent.

A few years ago, I heard about a two person play by  Cindy Johnson: “Brilliant Traces”.  The play was written around two characters in their 20’s: He was a hermit who had given up on life and lived in a cabin in the wilds of Alaska; she ran away from her wedding in Arizona, got in her car and drove and drove until her car broke down.  You guessed it:  At his cabin in the middle of a blizzard.  For the next ninety three non-stop minutes we watch as these two lost souls struggle with the changes in their lives.  The playwright calls for a suggested, simple set.  The play is very popular on the college circuit since the ages are appropriate and the set is simple.

I heard about the play when I talked to a director from a nearby university who had just finished a very different approach to the play:  Five universities from Boston to Washington State, rehearsed the play at the same time.  Then the female actors went to another university for the performance.  Think about it:  When the female actress opens the door of his cabin, she is on a set she has never seen before, facing an  actor she has never met.  Knowing her lines but having no idea how the blocking (movement) will unfold.  Imagine how scary that would be.  The next weekend the actresses went another university until, on closing weekend, she was finally back home acting in the play she had rehearsed.  A wonderful concept – something I have tried to figure out a way to do it locally but maybe on a smaller scale.

Anyway, I got the script to see what it was about.  I really liked it but . . . I saw a very different play than Cindy Johnson had in mind when she wrote it.  First I saw older actors, actors tho had a lifetime of experiences to bring to their characters.  Actors who have experienced more than a pair of 20 year old actors could ever experience.  I also saw a very real set.  The raw wood boards that make the walls, a small cabin where someone could hide from the world.  I knew that if I went forward with the play, I would have to be true to my vision of the play.  I’ve attached a photo of the set and actors.

I passed the script on to a woman around 60 years old to consider the female role and suggest a man she would like to work with.  She recommended an actor in his mid 60’s who had attended several acting training programs but had never been in on stage before.    We got together and read through the play a couple of times and I loved the way the two actors worked together.

Another digression:  Rehearsing a play.  For the most part, amateur play production rehearse around an hour for each minute of the play:  A ninety minute play will have ninety hours of rehearsal.  (Professional plays may have two or three times as much rehearsal time).  The larger the cast the longer each rehearsal can be.  In a two person play an hour and a half to two hours is about it:  The actors begin to tire.  In a large cast play, rehearsals can stretch to three or even four hours.  We decided to rehearse two afternoons a week for two hours each time.  (I had other plays in rehearsal at night so that option was out.)

We started rehearsing in the fall of 2008 without having a firm performance date.  We were going to rehearse it until it was ready.  In early 2009, we set a performance date in the fall of 2009.  By the time the show opened, we had almost 300 hours of rehearsal.  Our small 60 seat theater set an all time attendance record with this play:  We had an average audience of 71 people.

In 2010 we rented a theater in Seattle and did nine performances there.

Did I honor the playwrights intent?  I think so.  I think the ultimate intent of a playwright is to write a play that moves people.  “Brilliant Traces” definitely did that.

I have directed somewhere around 80 plays; “Brilliant Traces” is one of my five favorite plays.  “Enchanted April” is another.

Maybe we can get back to “Love Song” tomorrow.

Doug B

Jul. 14th, 2014

I’ll get back to “Love Song”.  I promise.  But first i want to talk about another play.

I think the hardest play to direct is a one person play.  I have never had the opportunity to find the actor/play combination that would work.  First, the time commitment of the actor in a one actor, 90 to 120 minute play is monstrous:  Memorizing the lines, finding ways to make it visually interesting and most importantly the ability to become all the other characters in the play makes the challenges almost insurmountable.  In a multiple person play, the actor has someone on stage with then they can rely upon if they go up on their lines or lose their place in the play.  It’s a whole different situation when you are on stage by yourself.

I have directed a couple of two person plays and find them really challenging.

I need to digress for a moment.

One of the rules for directing required the director to honor and illuminate the “intent” of the playwright in presenting the play.  In some cases (“Arthur:  The Begetting” and “Torso”, for example) I have built some degree of a relationship with the playwright and can ask them when I have questions as to their intent in a specific part of the play.  Other playwrights are too important for me to bother (Me?  Call Neil Simon?  Never happen.)   And still others are dead.  (Hey Will (Shakespeare), what did you mean in this scene?)

In 2007 I directed the play “Enchanted April” by Matthew Barber, from the novel by Elizabeth von Armin.  Here we have a double layer of interpretation:  My interpretation of Barber’s interpretation of the von Armin book.  I went back and read the book and I disagreed with some of Barber’s interpretation of the story.  What do I do?  In this particular case, I had seen two other productions of the play:  One at a very small theater in Olympia, Washington and one at a large  community theater in Ocala, Florida.  In both cases, their interpretation of a specific part of the play was the same but I thought then and still think seven years later that their interpretation was wrong.  Not just a little bit wrong but, to me, wrong enough to ruin the impact of the play.

I know I’m wandering from my main point but I want to follow this thought.

Enchanted April takes place in London and Italy in the 1920’s.  Four women, who all have major troubles in their lives meet and spend a month in Italy, ultimately solving their personal issues that make the play tick.  One of the women, Rose, had become distanced from her husband for (initially) unknown reasons.  In his loneliness, he socializes a lot without his wife.  He has met a beautiful, young woman (Lady Caroline) who, unknown to him, is one of the four women going to Italy.  In the first act (which takes place in London), we see the growing distance between Rose and her husband.  We see that he, at least, loves his wife very much but together they are unable to bridge the growing distance between them.  In the second act, we see how sad Rose is and how much she misses her husband and how unhappy she is.  One of the other women (Lottie) assures Rose that her husband will come to Italy to be with her.

Now to the point of all of this:  Late in the second act (just before Roses husband arrives to meet with Lady Caroline), Rose tells Lottie that the reason he won’t come is because she (Rose) can’t love him.  Rose bases this on the fact that they had a child that died.

Now my interpretation:  Rose can’t love him (in a physical sense, not the emotional sense) because she can’t stand the pain of losing another child.  Remember, this is in the 1920’s when birth control was no really available.  Anyway in both the Olympia and Ocala productions, the two actors were sitting on the floor in a remote area of the stage during this discussion (as called for in the script).  In my production I had the two actors standing at the very edge of the stage, as close to the audience as i could get them.  I had Rose, with tears streaming down her face,  shout her line:  “Lottie, I lost my child.”  Lottie used her thumbs to wipe away Roses tears as she assures her everything will be okay.  Of course, everything does end happily.

At the very end of the play, Lottie faces the audience and tells them “That they all gathered in Italy again the following year and . . . there would be a new child. . . .”    Without my interpretation that last line doesn’t mean anything.

A very different interpretation but who is to say that mine isn’t the way the author intended it?

When I direct a play, I spend two months in heavy study and analysis of the script, then two months of rehearsals then one month of performances.  For me to spend this kind of time on a play, it has to have a message that I MUST tell people.  It is that vision that I HAVE to bring to the stage.  It is the lesson the audience MUST learn.  That’s one reason that I read close to 100 plays in order to find one that moves me to the point where I HAVE to direct it.

King Lear is in that boat but I haven’t found the right actors to populate it and probably never will.  One Bucket List item that will never get checked off.

But enough wanderings for today.

Doug

Enchanted April

Jul. 13th, 2014

Want to start out by talking about the play I am currently directing: “Love Song” By John Kolvenback

Over the past fifteen years, my taste in plays has changed. I’m the first one to tell you that making money is important. Art is great but without money, there is no theater and without theater, there can be no art.

I have always been good at picking plays to produce and direct. Early on they were comedies and farces – playwrights like: Neil Simon, Milmore and VanZandt and Michael Parker – people loved them and our attendance grew rapidly. I soon branched out into well known dramas: “Wait Until Dark”, “Enchanted April” and “Arsenic and Old Lace” to name a few. Again, popular pieces that have withstood the test of time. Our theater has become very successful (far beyond my greatest expectations) with plenty of money in the bank and great support from the community. (Our success is also a burden but that is a story for another day.)

Things began to change in 2006 when I saw the play “Arthur: The Hunt” by Seattle playwright Jeff Berryman. I was very impressed with the play which was the second play in a series of seven plays which tell the story of King Arthur. I tracked down the playwright and got a copy of the first play in the series: “Arthur: The Begetting”. It read far better than the second play was on stage. “Arthur: The Begetting” follows the story of Arthur’s mother, Igraine, from her early life until the birth of Arthur. What excited me about the play was the approach: A strong female lead wrapped around a three way love story. The two Arthur plays we have done to date are not the Camelot we have all come to expect. They have sex, violence, mysticism and difficult themes (like incest). The play broke attendance records.

Somewhere between presenting the two Arthur plays, I saw a play the play “Torso” in Seattle. “Torso” was also written by a Seattle playwright, Keri Healey. I attended it because I knew the Director and one of the actors. Had I known what the play was about I probably would not have gone: Two different stories loosely joined together. In one story, a brother and sister (Margo and Dominick) plan and carry out the murder of their other brother (Anson). Late in the play, Dominick returns from killing his brother, covered in blood. While we watch in horror, he is stripped naked and the blood washed off him as he graphically describes beating his brother to death with a baseball bat. WOW!!! Audiences stayed away in droves but those who came were enthusiastic and the play made money. There was not a single complaint about the nudity.

Shortly after “Torso” came “Tracers” a blood and guts story of soldiers in Viet Nam.

What we learned from these plays was that they appealed to a totally new audience: Younger people.

Today, the under 35 age group is the fastest growing segment of our audience.

I will get to “Love Song” soon. I need to present some background on how I came to select this play but that’s it for today.Photo from TORSO:

The advantages of doing ten minute plays at your theater.

Hi:

First, some details about us:

Our group:
The Actors Theater of Orcas Island,
Eastsound, WA 98245

Contact Info:
web www.orcasactors.org

cell phone: Doug Bechtel (360) 317-5601

We are actually on an island in North Puget Sound. The population of our island is around 4,000, maybe 3,000 in the winter and far more in the summer. There are two full time theaters on the island – the 230 seat Orcas Center (www.orcascenter.org) and the 60 seat Actors Theater.

The Actors Theater does 5 or 6 shows a year with 5 to 7 performances each. Every year we present a ten minute playfest – 7 ten minute plays written by people who live on our island. It is, by far, our most popular show of the year – so popular that we charge $5 a ticket rather than our normal $10. Even with the $5 ticket it is our most profitable production of the year. Part of its popularity comes from the 50 people it takes to present the show – that guarantees 50 sets of friends and family.

The playfest is family oriented fare and G or PG rated. We have presented plays from playwrights as young as 14. Our plays have had actors as young as 10 years old. The playfest is juried. We set up an anonymous play review committee of experienced playwrights that read and offer suggestions on the plays submitted. They can then be reworked and re-submitted until the due date, the last day of February. We usually have 15 to 18 plays submitted. The selection is done based on the most recent submittal. The selection committee gives me a list of all plays ranked from best to worst. A second committee made up of actors, directors, and other theater
knowledgeable people also review the plays and provide me with their play rankings. I do not read the plays unless there is a question on suitability. I then make the final decision. For example, last year the two groups agreed on five plays, both ranked the sixth high but not in the top seven. The last play was difficult to choose – the remaining rankings of the two groups did not agree at all. I talked to both groups separately and made my choice.

It seems that every year we select four or five established playwrights and two or three new playwrights. We argue internally whether we want to do the “best plays” or encourage “new playwrights” but so far we have never had to make that choice. We’ve always had at least two new playwrights on the best play list so we have never had to cross that bridge.
We then offer the selected scripts to directors to select the one they want to direct. This is also a chance for new directors to show their capabilities. We try not to have a new director direct the play of a new playwright. We have never had a play that no one wanted to direct although there is always some arm twisting to match directors with playwrights. All new directors have an assigned “mentor” who attends rehearsals to make sure the director is moving the rehearsals forward. It is more difficult to find good mentors than it might seem. Many potential mentors tend to focus on the directorial choices made by the new director rather than on making sure the director is making choices.

I would say that over one third of our first time directors are not asked back.

The biggest problem we have with our ten minute playfest is getting the playwrights to step back and allow the director to do their work. The playwrights, particularly the first time ones, have such a strong vision of the play in their mind that they can’t accept any interpretation of their play that does not EXACTLY match the vision in their mind. Every year I have to get involved with one or two director/playwright combinations over their inability to find a joint vision of the play.

Another problem we have is dealing with plays are the scripts that are skits not plays. Skits that have no character arc. The writers feel that as long as they are funny they should be done. We try to be very firm about this but it is a difficult one to call. Sometimes the committees can’t agree on whether it is a skit or a play.

Another problem is trying to filter out the “tyrant playwright” – the playwright from Hell. People who are so domineering that the director can’t direct and the actors can’t act. For the most part we have been able to filter them out during the selection process.

I have never had to pull a play from the lineup after it was selected but I had to threaten to twice – once because the director interpretation of the play moved it outside the “family oriented” genre and once because the playwright wouldn’t step back and was running around backstage giving actors line readings and telling them to ignore the director and listen only to the playwright. I have replaced a director once and should have replaced the director another time. I usually attend a late rehearsal of each play to make sure things are doing well. For the first five years I directed one or two plays each year. The last two years I’ve tried not to direct but somehow I end up filling in for someone. Last year I had to step in for a sick director.

Here is an aside: Our upcoming playfest will be our 8th. In the beginning another director and I picked all the plays. A few years ago, we got the stupidest, dumbest, SciFi play I have ever read. It is about a spaceship run by a computer (played by an actor in a refrigerator!!!). I would never have given it a second glance, but I was talked into doing it because it was written by a high school student. It was the monster hit of the playfest. Go figure.

On a different topic:

Almost every year we present a second or third production of a new full length play. We don’t do first productions of full length plays because they take too much time. Playwrights have told me that it is far harder to get a second production than a first – because the “World Premier” cachet is gone.

We have done “World Premiers” in the past but it takes far too much work to get a script truly ready for the stage.

In November we closed the second production of TORSO by Seattle playwright Keri Healey. TORSO had been in rehearsal for the Seattle premier, off and on, for two years. We don’t have that kind of time.

Every two or three years, we present locally written works that are not suitable for our playfest due to material, language, style or length. These are normally done as fully staged readings. They are also very popular.

Our theater sponsors a playwrights forum which meets monthly to read and share work. There are about a dozen active playwrights on Orcas and a couple dozen that show up for playfest or to share their works in progress.

Every couple of years we present a six week workshop on writing plays that focuses on Ten Minute plays but also lays the foundation for longer plays.

If you have a 400 seat theater that you need to fill every night to pay the bills, ten minute plays may not be for you. At best, the quality of locally written ten minute plays is uneven. Here are my thoughts on whether a theater should do ten minute plays:

It takes a lot of actors to populate 7 or 8 ten minute plays. This gives the “under cast” actors opportunity to develop their skills.

Actors and Directors love the ten minute format – it all happens fast – you don’t have to give up three or more months to do a play.

It gives the theater a good chance to look at new directors without all the risks of putting a full production in the hands of a new (either first time or new to your theater) director.

It gives directors a chance to look at new actors under actual play conditions.

It doesn’t take long to put together a playfest – We look at over three months for a full production from auditions to closing night. A playfest is half that – 4 weeks from auditions to opening night. Each ten minute play has 6 to 8 rehearsals plus a couple of tech rehearsals, a dress rehearsal then opening night.

The load on the theater is heavy during rehearsals. In a full production we average 35 rehearsals over an eight week period. The ten minute plays need to schedule 50 to 70 rehearsals during a one month period. We have usually found that several plays can rehearse during the day. We limit individual play rehearsals to 90 minutes at night and 2 hours during the day and on weekends.

A ten minute playfest is inexpensive to produce: No set, no royalties, no costumes, etc. We allow each play $25 for incidentals.

The technical requirements are minimal- the walls of the set are fixed: Usually three doors and a window. Plays are very limited in their set up take down time so the set decoration is minimal. It is about the plays and the acting not the set. The lights are a standard wash with a special for each show. Each show provides its own pre and post show music.

It takes more time than you would expect to tie the various plays together. We schedule “furniture moving” rehearsals with the stage crew and directors. I know of another theater who does “Benchwarmers” – Ten Minute plays with no set – just a bench. We are far more liberal with our playwrights. The audience loves watching the choreographed scene changes.

Someone needs to keep an eye on the progress of the rehearsals – sometimes directors and playwrights take them outside our “Family Fare” criteria.

We assign a mentor to each first time director (whether new or experienced) to make sure the director is moving in the right direction and to answer production questions.

While we let each director choose which play they want to direct, we usually end having to do some gentle arm twisting to get the right combinations of playwrights and directors – we don’t want first time directors to work with first time playwrights.

Be prepared to mediate artistic differences between directors and playwrights. We make it clear that it is the playwrights vision that we will present not the directors.

We require playwrights to attend the first three rehearsals for rewrites then “encourage” them NOT to attend the remaining rehearsals.

You need to have experienced people work with the playwrights during script development. We tend to get a lot of skits with no character arc or other elements of a play.

We have an anonymous play review committee make comments on the plays as they are submitted. During review the plays are also anonymous. The playfest producer summarizes comments from the committee and furnishes them to the playwright for rewrites.

We set a cut off date for scripts but scripts are accepted at any time before the cut-off date and playwrights are encouraged to submit scripts as often as they want for critique and suggestions. The judging is based on the latest version of a play.

Hope this helps

Doug

Sunday, June 24th

I’ve been remiss in keeping my journal but my social schedule is keeping me busy.

I slept in to 8 am on Sunday. I think it’s going to take some time to catch up on my sleep.

I have a party in the Bed-Sty section of Brooklyn (Bedford – Stuyvesant for those not in the know) this afternoon then I plan on going to the Drama Book Shop then meet Madeline Muravchek for dinner at six at Union Square.

Easy to get to – two subways, walk five blocks. So I hop on the first subway – get off at 59th to find some beer to take with me. No luck. Back on the subway and get off at Times Square. Walk for blocks and blocks finally find a place that had cheap beer (Bud) for $11 a six pack. I get on the second of the two subways I need to take, realize about fifteen minutes into the trip I’m on the wrong subway, so I backtrack to Times Square again and look for the subway I was supposed to take. I can’t find it so I ask a cop. Nice guy, good answer. The subway I want isn’t available at Times Square – I need to go to West 4th and get it there. Know what subway I need? Right! The one I was on and back tracked so back onto it and go south. It’s now taken me over an hour and a half to get to where it was supposed to take me twenty minutes to get to. (But that includes getting the beer.) Get the right subway and get to the party over an hour late but I’m still one of the first there. The others trickle in over the afternoon. With very few exceptions, the later they arrive the later they got home last night (or to be more accurate, this morning).

You know, one of the best things about the subway is the cost structure. The fare is $2 (or $76 for an unlimited one month pass like I have) and once you are in the subway you can take as many trains as you want. You can ride all day if you want – until you leave the subway system.

The party was at a brownstone – what we call a townhouse today – the interesting thing is that the houses are just 20 feet wide. Deep enough to have a reasonable square footage but really narrow. This is based on my survey of two places. Different families live upstairs and downstairs.

The party was really fun – a nice mix of people from the Lab, others associated with the theater and neighbors of our host. We had a cookout in the back yard.

I’m having a real good time so I bag the plan to go to the Drama Book Shop and leave at 5 pm to meet Madeline at 6 at Union Square. I ask directions: Go to West 4th (I know that station pretty well now), walk north ten blocks to 14th then turn right and walk to Union Square. Is there any way to tell which way is North? Just walk towards the Empire State Building. Got it.

Back on the Subway, the right direction this time, get off at West 4th and exit the subway. First, there’s no way to see the Empire State Building or anything else with all the high buildings surrounding me. Second, I end up in the middle of the biggest Gay Pride parade I’ve ever seen – floats, streets blocked off in every direction, men wearing a G-string and nothing else, women topless with Obama stickers over their nipples. The sidewalks jammed with people to the point of making them impassable. I watched the parade for a few minutes then need to get going if I’m going to make Union Square by 6 pm. So I struggle through the mob, getting my ass grabbed regularly. I don’t want to know whether it is men or women – I think I know the answer – and at this point it really doesn’t make any difference. Relax and enjoy, right?

I get a call from Madeline and she is running late and won’t get there until 6:30. I’m saved. I get there about 20 after and Madeline shows up a few minutes later. We walk deep into the village and have a nice dinner at a Philipino restaurant. We talked for several hours. She says to say hi to everyone.

We talked about her life – she’s leaving for Paris with Rob O’Neill to teach theater for a month. She’s getting discouraged – she keeps auditioning and getting call backs but not getting the parts. She encourages me to do some theater off Orcas Island – of course, she thinks it should be in New York but maybe Seattle is okay.

I get home around eleven. My feet hurt from the walking. Somehow I got a blister. Which really surprises me – I’ve walked far further before.